Quantum Computing’s Cash Quest: Why D-Wave and Rivals Are Filling Their War Chests
A decade ago, venture investors debated whether quantum computing would ever escape the lab. Today, the conversation has flipped: every few weeks another listed quantum start-up taps equity markets for hundreds of millions of dollars. The spree signals both optimism and urgency, optimism that commercial-grade machines could arrive before 2030, and urgency because building them is burning cash at a furious pace.
A Funding Wave—All at Once
-
D-Wave Quantum
Raised: US $400 million via an at-the-market (ATM) offering completed this week, on top of a US $150 million ATM in January.
Cash now: undisclosed, but management says the new haul extends runway through the planned 2028 launch of its Advantage3 system. -
Quantum Computing Inc. (QCi)
Raised: US $200 million in a private placement last week.
Cash now: > US $350 million, enough for “multiple years of R&D,” according to executives. -
Rigetti Computing
Raised: US $350 million through its own ATM in June.
Cash now: US $575 million in cash and short-term investments, plus zero debt.
Collectively, the three pure-plays have secured roughly US $1 billion this year, dwarfing their combined 2024 revenue. None is profitable; each needs ever-larger systems, error-mitigation layers and expanded cloud capacity to court enterprise users. Equity remains the cheapest financing, banks are hesitant to lend and bond investors want earnings.
Why the Market Is (Still) Funding Loss-Makers
-
Technical Progress Is Tangible
-
D-Wave’s Advantage2, released to customers in May, delivered denser connectivity among qubits, vital for solving optimisation problems.
-
Rigetti’s Ankaa-3 prototype demonstrated sub-50-microsecond coherence times, a key fidelity milestone.
-
QCi unveiled Dirac-3, its photonic-boson sampler, which achieved record sampling rates.
-
-
Industry Confidence Is Building
IBM vows to ship a “fault-tolerant” quantum machine by 2029; Honeywell-backed Quantinuum and start-up PsiQuantum collectively took half of 2024’s US $2 billion private funding. McKinsey now pegs quantum’s 2035 TAM between US $28 billion and US $72 billion—numbers that entice public-market investors hungry for the next AI-style boom. -
First Revenue Streams Exist—If Lumpy
Over 300 organisations, from JPMorgan to Volkswagen, already run pilot workloads on D-Wave and IBM back-ends accessed through the cloud. Pay-per-use pricing mimics early public-cloud economics; once a single workload shows advantage, usage, and therefore revenue, can scale fast.
Strategy Divergence: Chips vs. Systems vs. Services
Company | Tech Focus | Scale Path | Near-Term Goal |
---|---|---|---|
D-Wave | Quantum annealing; multi-chip packaging | Increase qubit count via modular chips | Commercial optimisation solutions for logistics and manufacturing |
Rigetti | Superconducting gate-based processors | Larger monolithic chips; hybrid classical-quantum scheduler | 1,000-qubit, <1% error rate system by 2026 |
QCi | Photonic and room-temperature approaches | On-chip waveguides to reduce error–rate overhead | Deliver application-specific photonic accelerators |
The debate mirrors the early PC era: Intel bet on CMOS scaling, Sun on RISC, DEC on multi-chip modules. In quantum, no one yet knows which pathway will win—or whether multiple architectures will coexist, each tuned to a slice of the workload spectrum.
Investor Takeaways: Volatility Is Feature, Not Bug
Quantum equities trade like biotech: breakthroughs spike shares, delays punish them. Year-to-date moves illustrate the roller-coaster:
-
D-Wave +77 %
-
Quantum Computing +9 %
-
Rigetti –26 %
-
S&P 500 +5.2 %
Wild swings reflect binary expectation sets: either a company nails a materials milestone that halves error rates, or it slips a year and burns another US $100 million. For portfolio managers, position sizing and time horizon are crucial.
The Bigger Picture: An Arms Race to ‘Quantum Advantage’
Governments see strategic implications. The US CHIPS & Science Act earmarks funds for quantum fabs; China’s 14th Five-Year Plan lists quantum information as a top priority; the EU’s Quantum Flagship is steering €1 billion toward research hubs.
Corporate buyers are equally motivated. Financial-services firms want faster Monte Carlo simulations; chemical giants wait for precise molecular modelling; grid operators hope to optimise energy dispatch in real time. Whoever reaches reliable, fault-tolerant machines first could command platform-style margins.
Outlook: Burn Now, Billions Later?
McKinsey predicts quantum computing alone could generate up to US $72 billion in annual revenue by 2035, with adjacent quantum sensing and communications lifting the broader market near US $200 billion by 2040. To capture that upside, today’s players must survive another five-plus years of negative cash flow, incremental qubit gains and constant fund-raising.
Investors should expect more ATM offerings, convertible notes and strategic deals. The race is less a sprint than a relay, each financing round handing the baton to the next phase of engineering. For believers, every dilution event is also a ticket to stay in the quantum game.
Bottom line: Quantum computing remains a high-burn, high-beta sector—but fresh capital suggests public markets are willing to bankroll the moon-shot until the physics, and the profits, finally scale.
Photo Credit: DepositPhotos.com